• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Oh Well

  • About This Blog

Buddy, can you spare a dime?

7 October 2008 by Tim 16 Comments

Once we have bailed the banks out and subbed them so they can meet their short term liabilities, they will be able to get back to their usual work of driving genuine wealth-creating businesses and hard-working people into bankruptcy because they are unable to meet their short term liabilities. These people are very possibly going to be forced into these difficulties in part because of the extra tax they are going to be paying to bail out the banks.

If these ****heads are so important that they cannot be treated the same as any other business and allowed to go to the wall, why weren’t they tightly regulated?

Filed Under: General

« Oh look, someone has noticed
Kerboom »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Gill says

    8 October 2008 at 07:06

    I think they can and should be allowed to go to the wall, but then I don’t own shares, or big savings, so I would wouldn’t I? I think for there to be a healthier system in place the whole issue of money needs a rethink, speaking as one whose older relatives took her out for a much looked-forward-to birthday meal this summer then totally spoiled it by sulking because they’d lost 1% of their so-called wealth on some shares somewhere. Funny priorities, IMO.
    As regards regulation, I’m reading this book ATM, which has some interesting ideas. He thinks they should be heavily regulated too.

    Reply
  2. Tim says

    8 October 2008 at 07:33

    I don’t think it matters whether you have shares or savings. We need to know that payment orders, cheques, cash withdrawals and so on will work, ALWAYS.
    As far as the financial markets are concerned, they are supposed to be there so wealth creating business can raise capital.
    This has not been the case over the recent past as the markets have become gambling dens with activity focused on siphoning off money from pension funds and the like into the pockets of the players.

    Reply
  3. Gill says

    8 October 2008 at 07:53

    “We need to know that payment orders, cheques, cash withdrawals and so on will work, ALWAYS.”
    I don’t think such things should always be taken for granted though. No institution is infallible, is it?
    “As far as the financial markets are concerned, they are supposed to be there so wealth creating business can raise capital.”
    Oh, I thought they were just there so people could gamble, like a glorified bookie’s! Surely there’s never been a genuine altruistic motivation in them.

    Reply
  4. Tim says

    8 October 2008 at 08:32

    Yes, I agree, you should always keep a reserve of money under your mattress, just in case. ๐Ÿ™‚
    No, not altruistic at all. But if you want to start a small business, you can maybe raise capital by going to your friends and family and persuading them to invest in your business, by and large, they will not be altruistic either, they will expect a return on their investment. If you want to build a railway, you need to be able to draw on a wider group of investors and that is where stock markets come in. They also provide a means whereby investors can more readily sell their investments in businesses and buy others.
    But I perceive that the stock market ‘players’ have lost interest in wealth creating businesses and have turned their collective back on proper investment. The point is to trade and make a turn on each trade. The more frequently you trade the more money you make, so real world businesses which may take years to turn a profit are not really of any interest. Someone has to pay for this and the only way it can be done is by bleeding real investors like pension fund members and the business owners as well.

    Reply
  5. Gill says

    8 October 2008 at 09:32

    Yes, so investing in such things isn’t all that wise ATM, is it? I wouldn’t touch a pension plan with a barge pole.

    Reply
  6. Tim says

    8 October 2008 at 09:37

    I think the really big catch with pensions is that they trap money. When it comes time to find some money to pay all those unfunded public sector pensions, guess where the Government is going to look first.

    Reply
  7. Gill says

    8 October 2008 at 09:42

    Yes, that’s my opinion too. And the criminal thing is that people don’t receive that sort of advice – only the sort that favours the system.

    Reply
  8. Gill says

    8 October 2008 at 09:43

    “..you should always keep a reserve of money under your mattress, just in case”
    And some potatoes in your garden!

    Reply
  9. Tim says

    8 October 2008 at 16:09

    No. Not in the garden. Thieves may come in the night and steal valuables. Put them under your mattress too. ๐Ÿ™‚

    Reply
  10. Gill says

    8 October 2008 at 16:30

    Oh noooo! ๐Ÿ˜ฏ No room! It’s full of carrots! Will have to get a bigger mattress… now where’s me credit card? ๐Ÿ˜†

    Reply
  11. Tim says

    8 October 2008 at 17:21

    Credit card? You can’t afford a credit card. Pay them in carrots.

    Reply
  12. Gill says

    8 October 2008 at 19:15

    Ye gads! The man’s a genius! ๐Ÿ˜€
    Got a spare wheelbarrow I can borrow?

    Reply
  13. Tim says

    8 October 2008 at 22:09

    The word is rent. Not borrow. Rent.
    Times is hard.

    Reply
  14. Gill says

    8 October 2008 at 22:19

    Oh! Er… ok. *Rifles through wallet* Will you take a cheque? Credit card? ๐Ÿ˜€ No? What about this commercial paper I’ve got here? That’s worth tons of… erm… bad debt…
    What about a nice UK government bond? You know you’re safe with one of those… don’t you? ๐Ÿ˜•

    Reply
  15. Gill says

    8 October 2008 at 22:20

    Carrot?
    ๐Ÿ˜€

    Reply
  16. Tim says

    8 October 2008 at 22:34

    Now you are talking.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Tim Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Archives

Categories

Search

Copyright © 2025 ยท Tim Marchant ยท Cookie Policy ยท Privacy Policy ยท Log in